It is widely known that a closed form for the nth fibonacci number exists, namely
Fn=rn1−rn2√5r1=1+√52r2=1−√52
This closely resembles the way that we use complex conjugates to extract imaginary parts from complex numbers z:
z=a+biz∗=a−biIm(z)=z−z∗2i
Did you notice how in the fibonacci sequence we divide by the special number √5 and here we are dividing by the special number i? This means that, in some sense, Fn is the 'imaginary' part of rn1. The 'real' part, then, should be En=rn1+rn2 (possibly divided by 2) by analogy with Re(z)=z+z∗2.
Is there a recursive interpretation of En? Apparently, it's the same as for the fibonacci sequence:
n | 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
E_n| 2 1 3 4 7 11 18 29 47 76
No comments:
Post a Comment